This is for you Vaughn....
Over at Mountain West Connection, Jeremy posted his rankings on MWC coaches. Much to Vaughnzippers annoyance, Jeremy ranked Bronco below K-Whitt and Gary Patterson.
The following is Vaughns arguement for Bronco to be #1:
"If speed and talent are the things that everyone says hurts BYU then Bronco is the freaking man for making untalented slow white guys 10 game winners. Plus, he’s done all of this coming out of a very down period in BYU history with Crowton."
"Whitt on the other hand has had highs and lows but you have to contribute the 2008 season to what Meyer did in the 2004 season. All the players in the 2008 season were recruited based on the success from 2004. For that reason I have yet to give Whitt too much credit because last year was the first year we actually saw Whitt’s own team.
Bronco walked into nothing, Whitt walked into everything. Bronco should be #1… plus he has the best record and win pct."
Because I didn't wish to turn Jeremy post on MWC coaches into a Kyle vs Bronco fest , I'm continuing my retort here.
Vuaghn:
1: First of all I will not deny 2008 had a lot to do with 2004's success but you really are quick to take away credit from Whittingham. After the celebrations were done Kyle inherited a team he knew couldn't follow up to the marvelous campaign Urban Meyer had. First of all, he had to replace an OC and had no experienced QB. (BJ had only done minor mop-up duty for Alex Smith in 04'). Several key players besides Smith were gone too (Morgan Scalley, Sione Pouha, Steve Savoy, Paris Warren, the list goes on) . I think we both agree that BYU was a mess due to Gary Crowton's treatment but make no mistake: Utah was looking to rebuild too.
2. How can you say Kyle's first year was a picnic?. As I stated before, he only got ONE more win than Bronco did (7-5 compared to 6-6) do you base the first year woes on the fact Bronco lost the holy war and his first bowl game? If so I'll give you that one. If you take both Utah's 2005 team and BYU's 2005 team and put them head to head on paper, they are pretty equal in my eyes.
3. Your bit on Chris Paterson was weird because we weren't even discussing BSU. We'll make that judgment next year when he's actually a MWC coach. But to answer your question , Yes I think he is a great coach ,his record is better than Kyles and he has two BCS wins but we both know the WAC isn't exactly the SEC. (nor is the MWC for that matter) Better than Kyle? I honestly don't know.
4. Okay, how many players from 2004 played on the 2008 squad? yeah, I can only count them on one hand too. My point is four years is too much of a gap to claim 2008 was all from Meyers previous work. With the exception of the 2005 class, the recruiting gap between Utah and BYU wasn't all that huge. Plus 7-5, 8-5 aren't exactly prime examples of what you would normally call a successful year (especially if we got all those great recruits from 2004 you're talking about). YES, 2004 opened doors for us in recruiting but 2008 was Whittingham's work just as much as 2004 was Meyer's.
5. If all you Cougar fans claim that the 1984 championship gives you bragging rights, why can't we claim our BCS wins give us the same?. I get it, strait up a championship trumps a BCS win but the fact is your boy Bronco hasn't been able to do what Kyle W. , Gary P. and Chris P. have done: Get their team into the big game. It's not always fair that coaches are judged based solely on the biggest games they've been in but that's how sports works. Bronco's overall wins and better percentage in the MWC are impressive but until he can add the big game on his resume, people will not put him in the same discussion.
Bottom line is this: I don't think that Kyle Whittingham is a "better coach" than Bronco. He's just done more in his time at Utah than Bronco has at BYU. Both of em' has shaky first years, and both of em' saw their teams lay some serious eggs in their coaching years after 2004. All I'm saying is I object to the idea that all of Kyle's success was all Meyers doing. Both of em' are great coaches who were the right man to follow the respective situations they inherited from their predecessors.
Kyle's bowl record 5-0, Bronco, 3-2.
This is a FanPost of the Vanquish The Foe community. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or of VTF
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here we go
1. Yes, Utah was rebuilding. But if we were to compare the rebuilding KW had in his hands at Utah to what Bronco inherited at BYU it would be like fixing the transmission and A/C on a car for KW but Bronco having to take a totaled car and completely rebuild it. Fair enough? Of course there’s going to be kinks in the road when you switch coaches but I think it’s pretty fair to say where Kyle had a kink Bronco had a corkscrew. Bronco wasn’t able to hit the recruiting trails talking up BYU success, there wasn’t any. KW had that in his favor, and if you’re a young athlete what do you think would look more attractive? Plus, you mention KW having to replace an OC, Bronco had to replace an OC as well. Not to mention that BM had only been in the BYU program for 2 seasons before becoming HC while KW had been in the Utah program for 10 years. That helps recruiting, team familiarity, coaching staff, etc.
2. Not sure how you can say a team that just came off a BCS bowl is equal to a team that came off a 5-6 season and lost everyone as well. It’s pretty fair to say that head to head KW’s first year was a picnic compared to BM’s.
3. Your reason for why BM is not on the same level as KW and GP is because he doesn’t have a BCS bowl. You’re telling me that if normal Joe Shmoe who didn’t know a lick about football were to rank cfb coaches based on BCS games played then KW would be ranked higher then BM. So using that same reasoning I say CP would be ranked higher than KW. Just following your lead on that one. Based on your theory you shouldn’t refute that fact, just like you’re saying I shouldn’t refute what you had to say.
4. I think you’re missing the point here. First, you had redshirts in 2004 (I know atleast two, BJ and Paul Kruger… the 2 biggest names from 2008) who played on the 2008 squad. Then throw in the fact that KW played the BCS chip while recruiting for the 2005 season. BM didn’t have that luxury.KW landed bigger recruits that year no doubt because of the success they had just had weeks earlier in Tuscon.
5. Again, a Ute brings up 1984. Show me where I mentioned it once as a bragging rite? Bronco will get his BCS bowl. It took KW 10 years to finally get one as an assistant, I predict Bronco has one in the next 4 years (10 total seasons at BYU) as a HC and he can then say he did it all on his own.
Bottom line is this: BM has done more in his time at BYU than KW has at Utah. He’s turned a Pinto into a Acura and well on his way to making it a Mercedes. Both are good coaches, my argument is that BM has done more with the talent he has and the limitations that come with recruiting kids to BYU than KW has with Utah.
Not all of KW’s success comes from Meyer but then again it wasn’t until last year that we actually got to see what KW could do. One parting note. Bronco has 2 QB’s that were Gatorade POY’s, KW has… Terrance Cain? Not the best start.
Actually . . .
BYU has a better football tradition than Utah has in the last 30 years and they also have a much deeper commitment ot football than the U of U.
Consequently rebuilding at Utah is a far more difficult task.
Hmmmm.
Recruiting: I just went over to Rivals.com and looked at the signing classes of both Utah and BYU in the 04-08 period and this is what I found:
In 2005: Utah had a bit of an edge but most of it was a flurry of 2 star recruits
Utah:
2*-18
3*-5
4*-1
BYU
2*-12
3*-3
4*-1
I’ll give you 2006 Utah won that one easily
Utah:
2*-15
3*- 9
4*- 1
BYU:
2*-21
3*-5
4*-0
But after a MWC title, BYU closed the gap in 2007
Utah:
2*- 17
3*- 8
4*- 0
BYU:
2*-13
3*- 10
4* -1
Jump to 2008 and BYU out recruits us again
Utah:
2*-5
3*-9
4*-1
BYU:
2*-12
3*-9
4*-1
As you can see, the gap wasn’t all as big as you think Vaughn. KW played the BCS win card but BM had one card KW never did or ever will: BYU’s big name and long history (i.e. Lavell Edwards legacy). Even though the monopoly isn’t really in their favor as much as it was in the past, BYU still has dibs on several high class LDS talent (look no further than your new QB Jake Heaps). Any advantage we had in 2005-06 was quickly decimated when you guys beat us in 2007-08 signing classes (two strait MWC titles will do that ).
2004 players: You argue that BJ and Paul Kruger were two of the biggest names in 2008. I won’t argue that point, what I do argue is that when Urban Meyer recruited them they hadn’t reach their full potential: B. Johnson was a two star QB who had only received offers from two other schools, And as I said before, he had only done minor mop-up duty for Alex Smith in 2004. Kruger was a two star kid as well, but even more important is that he was redshirted that year and thus didn’t play one down in 2004 (plus, he was gone for two years) Yes, Urban Meyer recruited them, but it was Kyle’s staff that coached them into good players. Are you saying that because a decent part of BYU’s 2006 team were Gary Crowton’s boys, that means BH doesn’t deserve props for leading them to a MWC title? using that logic is just stupid .
BCS wins: I don’t have a lot of personal bias toward BH, I just call the shots how I see them. It not just Jeremy and me that think Bronco is not up to par because he lacks what KW, GP and CP have. All over the net ,writers rank BYU as the best non-BCS conference school that hasn’t been to a bowl ( a title that used to belong to TCU until last year).
Chris Peterson is a dang good coach that I think is on KW level and beyond, the problem is his team plays in the WAC. The other difference is Peterson is a gambler. All those trick plays he used in both Fiesta Bowls could have come to bite him but that’s how college football is: the lucky ones get credit when they succeed and become goats when they fail. This is not to say CP has his stripes based solely on luck. My point is CP had to use trickery to win his BCS games. Kyle’s staff just plain dominated and out-coached Saban in the Sugar bowl. But I’m not here to discuss BSU, we’re talking about Bronco: I won’t say this again: nobody will give BM credit over KW and GP until he does what they did. It’s just a plain fact. Just as much as nobody will put LeBron in the same discussion as Kobe or Jordan until he gets rings of his own: is it fair? no but that’s just how it works.
You have to understand Vaughn, the decision to take the Utah job over the BYU job wasn’t as easy as you think. Utah had just won the BCS: no argument there, but the loss of Alex Smith, lots of seniors, and the added weight of high expectations to follow up on UM success was not easy to take. BYU wasn’t exactly a bare cupboard either , You had a good back in Curtis Brown, you had Austin Collie who even as a freshman showed tremendous talent (yes, I know he went on a mission after 2004 but you guys knew he was going to be special when he came back) but most of all ,You had QB John Beck who even though He hadn’t reached his full potential, still had more experience than Utah’s BJ.
The bottom line is Gary Crowton was bad news, (I think both of us can agree on that one) not only did Bronco offer a new direction in coaching, he was a breath of fresh air from Crowton’s mess and whether you want to believe it or not , the expectations on his shoulders were not a big as KW at Utah. BM was hired to get BYU competitive again: he succeeded. Kyle was hired to keep up what Urban Meyer started: he didn’t succeed (at least not right away) but he got Utah back to the BCS eventually.
I admit I was stupid to bring 1984 in to the discussion, that’s your job.
You should check Scout.com
Since that’s where BYU fans get their flurry of February championships.
In fact, I’ll do it for you:
I left out 2002 because Scout.com only has 4 recruits for Utah that year, although BYU is the highest-ranked non-BCS program that year at 46th.
2003:
BYU: 59th (608 pts)
Utah: 95th (261 pts)
Difference: 36 places and 347 pts. Apparently a huge win for BYU recruiting (according to Scout).
2004:
BYU: 55th (562 pts)
Utah: 68th (382 pts)
Difference of 13 places and 180 pts. A significant win for BYU recruiting.
2005:
BYU: 53rd (487 pts)
Utah: 71st (339 pts)
Difference of 18 places and 148 pts. Another significant win for BYU recruiting.
2006:
BYU: 46th (620 pts)
Utah: 60th (461 pts)
Difference of 14 places and 159 pts. Another significant win for BYU recruiting.
2007:
BYU: 42nd (1561 pts) (the point system changed this year apparently)
Utah: 66th (927 pts)
Difference of 24 places and 634 points. This is the biggest gap in places since 2003, but hard to compare the point gap with prior years.
So, according to every BYU fan’s favorite recruiting source, Utah has significantly outperformed BYU with significantly inferior talent.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
by displacedute on Aug 13, 2010 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Please learn to hit the "reply" button.
Also, thanks for the discussion. We encourage these kind of debates as long as they are done witha well mannered language, being considerate of others. Thanks again.

by 















